Author:
Michelle Zak
The last two years have delivered the most intense cycle of transaction-reporting rewrites the industry has seen in a decade, effectively pushing firms toward scalable technological solutions.
APAC
Europe & UK
North America
Every rewrite has come with more fields, tougher validations, and more reconciliation constraints. Firms that previously relied on a patchwork of discrete platforms can no longer afford de-centralisation. This rings especially true of firms that cover multiple jurisdictions. Chances are that if you are a Swap Dealer on one regime, then you’ve got a global presence across regimes. This means multiple reporting obligations.
This global synchronisation, with regulators aligning around data standards like ISO 20022, UPI, and harmonised critical data elements, is a major catalyst for automation. Firms see a pathway to using one consistent technology framework across G10/G20 regimes, something that was almost impossible five years ago.
Larger institutions are now converging towards standardised data lakes and regulatory reporting engines that will pump out, at the very least, the Critical Data Elements that will fulfil the core requirements of most regimes, absent of course, MiFID in UK/Europe.
Leveraging technology is high on the list of transaction reporting agenda. This means leaving validations and detection of inaccuracies to the exports, and inhouse development focussed more on centralisation and standardisation.
Qomply has seen a notable increase in enquiries relating to our Quality Assurance and Accuracy solutions in Europe and UK, and in North America and APAC, more firms are signing onto our Reconciliation Solutions where there tends to be more demands from the regulators for the timely detection of breaks.
In 2026, expect to see a convergence to standardisation as the world pivots to technology and AI with specialised providers, such as Qomply, fully integrated in the workflow
Want to know more or just want to phone us up for a chat?
+44(0)20 8242 4789