Author:
Sophia Fulugunya
Director of Transaction Reporting
02 December 2024
When it comes to transaction reporting, ensuring accuracy is paramount—particularly for OTC trades involving instruments executed with Systematic Internalisers (SIs). A recurring issue arises when firms mistakenly report transactions that aren’t reportable or fail to report those that are. Here, we address two key challenges and propose ways in which firms can mitigate them.
1. Inefficient FIRDS Checks
One major source of misreporting stems from incomplete or inefficient use of FIRDS.
Firms often report transactions for all instruments listed on FIRDS without fully considering the type of entity submitting the reference data. This is problematic, as the regulator has acknowledged inconsistencies in reference data submitted under RTS 23 by trading venues and SIs. For example, SIs sometimes provide reference data for instruments that lack a ToTV underlying, inadvertently bringing unreportable transactions into scope.
What’s the risk?
Overreporting can lead to extensive cancellation exercises, consuming significant time and resources.
The solution?
Firms must go beyond merely checking FIRDS for an instrument’s inclusion. They need to identify whether the reference data was submitted by an SI and, crucially, confirm if the instrument has a ToTV underlying. This additional layer of scrutiny is essential to avoid unnecessary reporting which can lead to extensive and costly cancellation exercises.
2. Underreporting Due to Ignoring Underlying Instruments
Another frequent error arises when firms incorrectly classify transactions as non-reportable based solely on the SI being the only MIC listed, without considering the underlying instrument.
What’s the risk?
This type of oversight results in underreporting—a critical compliance issue. Regulators, including the FCA, view underreporting as one of the highest-priority transaction reporting errors.
Insights from the FCA’s Discussion Paper (DP24/2)
In its recent discussion paper, the FCA highlighted the scale of this issue. On August 28, 2024, approximately 60,000 instruments were reported to FIRDS without an underlying indicating these instruments were likely out of scope.
To address this, the FCA is considering removing the requirement for SIs to submit reference data (IRD). While this would necessitate firms populating fields 42–56 for instruments traded with an SI, the operational simplicity of determining reportability would outweigh the added workload.
Key Takeaways for Firms
• Thorough FIRDS checks: verify the submitting entity and confirm the presence of a ToTV underlying for SI-reported instruments.
• Understand the MIC context: Don’t assume a transaction is unreportable solely because the MIC belongs to an SI; always evaluate the underlying.
By addressing these challenges proactively, firms can significantly reduce the risk of both overreporting and underreporting, ensuring greater compliance and operational efficiency.
About Qomply
Qomply takes away the pain by getting transaction reporting right the first time.
Qomply’s technology automatically executes a sophisticated matrix of rules and scenarios across reports from field-level to business-logic level. With thousands of validation rules, Qomply easily exceeds the 250 validation rules set forth by the regulators.
Firms are empowered to conduct real-time checks as well as retrospective checks – making Quality Assurance, Remediation Exercises and Day-to-Day reporting straightforward.
Qomply’s easy-to-use dashboard empowers firms to send their reports directly to the regulator – bypassing costly fees with efficient, straight-through processing power.
This all leads to the fewest number of steps in the pipeline of reporting and ensuring reports are right the first time.
