MiFID Transaction Reporting | Troubleshooting
We often see firms struggle with the population of the venue field under RTS 22 transaction reporting. This is especially an issue where the trade has been executed off-venue or over-the-counter (OTC) as it is commonly referred. The question arises: do I populate XOFF or XXXX.
We can all agree that the text within the RTS could be clearer and hope that there will be improvements post regulator reviews both in the UK and EU. In the meantime, it's essential to understand the criteria for when XOFF and XXXX classifications become applicable:
XOFF – Is populated where the OTC trade relates to a ToTV (Traded on a Trading Venue) instrument (one that is available for trading on an OTFs (Organised Trading Facility), MTFs (Multilateral Trading Facility) or RMs (Regulated Market). This indicates that the trade was executed off-venue but is related to a financial instrument available for trading on a venue.
XXXX – Is populated where the instrument is brought into scope by the underlying and is traded OTC. This indicates that the trade was executed off-venue and is related to an OTC derivative, index or basket where at least one of the underlying instruments or constituents is available for trading on a venue.
There is the matter of the difference in what constitutes a trading venue under EU and UK MiFIR.
• Under EU MiFIR ToTV applies to EEA trading venues
• Under UK MiFIR ToTV applies to UK, EEA and Gibraltar venues
Trading venues refer to OTFs, MTFs and RMs. Systematic Internalisers (SIs) are not trading venues therefore if an instrument is traded only on SIs, the instrument would not be considered TOTV.
XXXX and XOFF are different in the following way:
• For OTC transactions on instruments that are NOT ToTV on a UK or EEA trading venue (ToTV) but the underlying instrument is ToTV in either jurisidicaiton, report the Trading Venue as XXXX
• For OTC transactions on instruments that are ToTV on a UK or EEA trading venue, report the Trading Venue as XOFF
• For OTC transactions on instruments that are NOT ToTV on an EEA Venue but the underlying instrument is ToTV, report the trading venue as XXXX
• For OTC transactions on instruments that are ToTV on an EEA venue, report the trading venue as XOFF
To help in understanding the subtle differences, the flowchart below summarises the process in deciding when to use XXXX of XOFF for UK and EEA firms.
Click here to view a step-by-step walkthrough of examples of XOFF and XXXX transactions.
To determine which of XXXX or XOFF to use, you can use the freely-available Qomply FIRDS lookup tool to establish whether an instrument was tradeable on a venue in the UK or EEA at a given date.
The video above takes you through using this tool.
Access the Tool
https://qti.qomplypi.com/firdslookup
In order to determine XXXX or XOFF, first determine reportability
To determine if a particular instrument was considered reportable on a trade date, enter the ISIN and the Trade Date of 10-01-2022, as shown in the image below. If a date is not entered, the system will retrieve data for today.
In our test, we use ISIN IE00B00FV011
The results show whether the instrument is reportable in the UK and/or reportable in the EU alongside the Trading Venue on which it was active. If you are reporting to the UK regulator then you are only interested in whether the instrument was reportable in the UK. Therefore, if TRUE appears at least once in the “Reportable in UK” column, the instrument is reportable.
Since the instrument was reportable (as we see TRUE in the Reportable in the UK column) and traded OTC, then in this example we would report the trading venue as XOFF.
In this example, we will illustrate the use of XXXX.>
As seen in the image below, we will use ISIN DE000F91J1YF and Trade Date of 20-09-2021.
For this ISIN and trade date, the results show that the instrument is not reportable. We know this because the "Reportable in the UK" column contains one value: False. This means for a UK-based firm trading OTC in the UK, this instrument is not reportable. However, let's say that this transaction has one underlying ISIN: IE00B00FV011.
Following the flowchart above, we know that we must check each underlying instrument of the transaction to determine reportability.
We would repeat this process for each underlying instrument. In doing so, we can see that the underlying instrument is reportable for the trade date of 20-09-2021.
Therefore, since the underlying instrument is reportable and the transaction was executed OTC, we use XXXX as the trading venue.
If none of the underlying instruments is reportable, then the transaction would be considered out of scope for the purposes of MiFID II transaction reporting.
Although we have used the UK for both examples, the same applies for for those firms reporting to an EEA regulator. Qomply FIRDS look up takes into account the jurisdictional complexities in determining reportability.
Qomply removes the pain from transaction reporting and ensures report are accurate.
Qomply’s technology automatically executes a sophisticated matrix of granular, field-level and scenario-based rules.
Firms are empowered to conduct real-time checks as well as retrospective checks.
Immediate and accurate results outline the quality of the report with easy-to-read guidance walks users through the steps to correct issues.
If you are looking to conduct your own Quality Assurance, Accuracy, Completeness, and Timeliness checks, then the ReportAssure Suite puts over 1,000 of checks in a click.
Require a Comprehensive One-off Health Check Instead?
Quality Assurance in a Click
Want to know more or just want to phone us up for a chat?
+44(0)20 8242 4789